<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Logo Critique Needed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.professionalgifting.com/2008/08/logo-critique-needed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.professionalgifting.com/2008/08/logo-critique-needed/</link>
	<description>The Right Gift. The Right Package. The Right Source.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:36:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee</title>
		<link>http://www.professionalgifting.com/2008/08/logo-critique-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 18:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.professionalgifting.com/?p=1244#comment-616</guid>
		<description>I prefer logo 1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer logo 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Darling</title>
		<link>http://www.professionalgifting.com/2008/08/logo-critique-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Darling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.professionalgifting.com/?p=1244#comment-340</guid>
		<description>The first one is too hard to read.  Logos need to be readable at a glance.  The Next two are not very attractive either.  I would use the first keeping the seal and changing the font.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first one is too hard to read.  Logos need to be readable at a glance.  The Next two are not very attractive either.  I would use the first keeping the seal and changing the font.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.professionalgifting.com/2008/08/logo-critique-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.professionalgifting.com/?p=1244#comment-313</guid>
		<description>I echo Adam Arceneaux&#039; comments:

I like the first logo best, because it tells me what Jacobites are, and because it reflects something about their heritage. I would, however, suggest a slightly cleaner font because I had a difficult gettting the word “Jacobites” out of it until I studied it closely. Maybe not all caps would help, too.

The second logo is my least favorite. Looks like an Islamic organization, with Islamic script. Nothing wrong with that, but I’m not aware of too many Islamic bag-pipe bands.

The third logo is the cleanest, but tells me nothing about the organization.

Good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I echo Adam Arceneaux&#8217; comments:</p>
<p>I like the first logo best, because it tells me what Jacobites are, and because it reflects something about their heritage. I would, however, suggest a slightly cleaner font because I had a difficult gettting the word “Jacobites” out of it until I studied it closely. Maybe not all caps would help, too.</p>
<p>The second logo is my least favorite. Looks like an Islamic organization, with Islamic script. Nothing wrong with that, but I’m not aware of too many Islamic bag-pipe bands.</p>
<p>The third logo is the cleanest, but tells me nothing about the organization.</p>
<p>Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hutson</title>
		<link>http://www.professionalgifting.com/2008/08/logo-critique-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hutson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.professionalgifting.com/?p=1244#comment-310</guid>
		<description>I vote #1 as well. The real reason for our input has to be more about marketing Ken than just a simple survey. Brilliant. Now you have our email and website info. Brilliant.

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vote #1 as well. The real reason for our input has to be more about marketing Ken than just a simple survey. Brilliant. Now you have our email and website info. Brilliant.</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce H. Alfreds</title>
		<link>http://www.professionalgifting.com/2008/08/logo-critique-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce H. Alfreds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.professionalgifting.com/?p=1244#comment-309</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m late (was on vacation). #1 is best with a little cleaner font (the one you&#039;re using is hard to read).  Also, #1 actually says what the Jacobites are (is?).  #2 looks sort of cartoonish.  #3 looks like a logo for a bottle of booze.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m late (was on vacation). #1 is best with a little cleaner font (the one you&#8217;re using is hard to read).  Also, #1 actually says what the Jacobites are (is?).  #2 looks sort of cartoonish.  #3 looks like a logo for a bottle of booze.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susan center</title>
		<link>http://www.professionalgifting.com/2008/08/logo-critique-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>susan center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.professionalgifting.com/?p=1244#comment-308</guid>
		<description>I really like the first one. It grabs my attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the first one. It grabs my attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Borges</title>
		<link>http://www.professionalgifting.com/2008/08/logo-critique-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Borges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 15:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.professionalgifting.com/?p=1244#comment-305</guid>
		<description>Seems it&#039;s unanimous, as I&#039;m also a fan of #1. Very colorful and provides an idea of what the Jacobites are. Font is a bit tricky to read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems it&#8217;s unanimous, as I&#8217;m also a fan of #1. Very colorful and provides an idea of what the Jacobites are. Font is a bit tricky to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dian Sommers</title>
		<link>http://www.professionalgifting.com/2008/08/logo-critique-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Dian Sommers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 23:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.professionalgifting.com/?p=1244#comment-304</guid>
		<description>Honestly I don&#039;t like any of them. 
1) The name has pipes and drums in it so why isn&#039;t there an image of a drum included in the logo?  the flower looks out of place and the font is hard to read.
2)Looks like a logo for a set of golf clubs.
3)Looks like something from another brand.

I would continue with having the graphic designer look into what products are to be sold, if the products are a low or high end line,and if you want to promote the name or the product brand.

Hope this is the kind of feedback you were wanting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly I don&#8217;t like any of them.<br />
1) The name has pipes and drums in it so why isn&#8217;t there an image of a drum included in the logo?  the flower looks out of place and the font is hard to read.<br />
2)Looks like a logo for a set of golf clubs.<br />
3)Looks like something from another brand.</p>
<p>I would continue with having the graphic designer look into what products are to be sold, if the products are a low or high end line,and if you want to promote the name or the product brand.</p>
<p>Hope this is the kind of feedback you were wanting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joan Mansbach</title>
		<link>http://www.professionalgifting.com/2008/08/logo-critique-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Joan Mansbach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.professionalgifting.com/?p=1244#comment-303</guid>
		<description>To repeat, #1 - with clear modifications to the type - the readability is poor. Be sensitive to the type size as well - it does not have to scream. #2 is a total disconnect and #3 is so Heraldic and far too many people are using that symbol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To repeat, #1 &#8211; with clear modifications to the type &#8211; the readability is poor. Be sensitive to the type size as well &#8211; it does not have to scream. #2 is a total disconnect and #3 is so Heraldic and far too many people are using that symbol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Bahr</title>
		<link>http://www.professionalgifting.com/2008/08/logo-critique-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Bahr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.professionalgifting.com/?p=1244#comment-302</guid>
		<description>well thinking about salable clothing you also have to think about your key demographic, I would say the majority of your buyers are going to know who the jacobites are. I personally like the 3rd graphic for apparel its rather simple and the celtic lion is a nice logo. it would also look nice on a few different colors (yellow blue white, and with a change of font of font color black)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well thinking about salable clothing you also have to think about your key demographic, I would say the majority of your buyers are going to know who the jacobites are. I personally like the 3rd graphic for apparel its rather simple and the celtic lion is a nice logo. it would also look nice on a few different colors (yellow blue white, and with a change of font of font color black)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

